Month: January 2026

  • January 2026: Newsletter 101

    January 2026: Newsletter 101

    There’s gonna be a lot of changes round ‘ere.

    January 2026

    Newsletter 101

    This is the 101st edition of my newsletter, and I’m changing everything. I’m changing where it lives. I’m changing how it looks. I’m changing my whole approach to putting my music, and my thoughts, out in the world. And, by golly, it’s actually fun again.

    Okay, to be fair, at the moment it looks pretty much the same as it always did, but it now lives on my website rather than on the Mailchimp email newsletter platform.

    I’ll explain the reasons for the move in a bit, but it’s part of a shift in focus for me that I’m really excited by.

    I’ve rediscovered why personal websites are amazing, and generally undervalued and underappreciated. After years of lock-in on social media platforms, I’m really struck by how much you can do with them.

    Now, I have left this website to collect dust and mildew for a number of years, and despite my frantic updating in the last few days, I’m sure lots of it is still broken – sorry! But I feel like I actually have a vision for how it should work in future.

    In fact, this month I’ve got a bit carried away and maybe done a bit too much on this in too short space of time, so I feel like it might be even more chaotic than usual, but here’s what we have:

    A whole new separate section for the dark political stuff, so it’s a lot easier to avoid for anyone who isn’t feeling it. And also, some light relief I made last year.

    In terms of recommendations, it’s mainly folk or folk-adjacent music – some new, some old. But there’s also a couple of oddball recommendation choices in there too.

    And there’s also a lot about how to do creative projects online. Within a hostile and increasingly toxic walled-garden internet.

    Basically, I think we make our own little spaces of refuge.

    And this is mine.


    Featured

    MICROSONGS

    One fun by-product of overhauling this website is I’ve been trawling through all the stuff I’ve made over the years. This batch of microsongs is actually probably the most recent.

    Some of them are literally just a few seconds long, but each one cuts right to the very quick of the human condition.

    Be prepared to go on a pyscho-philosophical journey.

    Bring snacks.

    Featured

    THE QUIET PART LOUD

    Something I’ve written about before is that there is this tension being an artist in, or even just adjacent to, authoritarianism. Either you make your art about what the regime is doing, in which case they kind of win, or you ignore it, in which case you are tacitly treating it as normal, in which case you are tacitly endorsing it, in which case they win.

    I feel like it’s difficult to have something to say, however small your audience, if you’re not addressing the rampaging elephant in the room. But it can’t be the only thing you have to say. As we say now: joy is resistance.

    So I want to pull all my thoughts on the current state of world politics into a regular, but separate, article which readers can dip into if they’re interested, but which they can just avoid if they want to.

    This is the Quiet Part Loud.


    Recommended

    PANTO HORSE SONG

    Sometimes, it can just be as simple as clicking on a video by a musician you’ve never heard of because the title suggests it’s about a pantomime horse.

    A sweet and (deliberately) silly song. Highly recommended.

    Recommended

    MAVIN GAYE’S CLUELESS ASS

    Screenshot of a Spotify playlist by 'Diego' entitled "Marvin Gaye's clueless ass". The tracklist includes: What's Going On, What's Happening Brother, When Did You Stop Loving Me, Where Are We Going, I Don't Know Why, Why Did I Choose You, etc. It has 18,257 saves.

    This might be the first time that I’ve recommended a meme.

    But I saw this screenshot on Bluesky, and it keeps making me smile. (No disrespect to one of the greats of Motown.)

    It’s odd to suggest that a Spotify playlist could have perfect comic timing, but it does.

    Recommended

    CLAUDE CODE

    I appear to be recommending an AI tool from one of the big AI companies.

    But there has been so much talk about Claude Code that I feel like it’s worth identifying the cultural influence it’s having.

    Software developers are saying that this has already changed the way they make a code forever.

    Although, it’s probably worth adding a cautious caveat that I’ve also heard: making code is now incredibly cheap, but making software is still expensive. Edge cases, server maintenance, bandwidth costs, etc.

    But still, it seems pretty incredible.

    Recommended

    THE MUSIC WE LOST

    I mentioned that I’m trying to parcel off all the more distressing stuff into a separate article.

    This is, in its way, a pretty distressing video, detailing the Irish famine of the 1840s and how it has affected Irish music, culture and life ever since.

    It was recommended on the local folk Discord server, and if you are a folk nerd, I highly recommend checking it out.

    Recommended

    KYNTRA

    Another recommendation from the Bad Tradition Discord server. This time of a folk duo – one of whom I was in The Reverenzas with a million years ago.

    I haven’t seen young Henry Webster in a long time, as he lives in that London now. Although, rumour has it he’s been to local sessions and I’ve just missed him.

    But he was a great fiddle player then and he’s a great fiddle player now. The guitar playing is pretty great too.

    Recommended

    BJÖRK SINGS THE ANCHOR SONG (IN ICELANDIC)

    I still believe that Björk doesn’t get the recognition she deserves, as being perhaps Europe’s singular musical genius of the 1990s.

    Despite her playful genre-hopping, I still associate her with the electronic, synthetic, modernistic.

    But in this video, she just rides up to a local Icelandic church on her bicycle and plays the last song on her first debut album, singing in Icelandic.

    It’s a whole different side to her, and it feels to me like a ray of sun on a heavily overcast day.

    Here are the lyrics:

    I live by the ocean / And during the night / I dive into it / Down to the bottom / Underneath all currents / And drop my anchor / This is where I’m staying / This is my home


    Upcoming Events

    Friday 14th February


    Dear Diary…

    A couple of years ago I was so happy that I had finally found the ideal creative channel for making music the way I wanted to make it: YouTube. I would record music, and make music videos, and then document the process of making them and comment on any interesting tangents along the way. The videos were way too long and unfocused, but I don’t regret making them like that. It gave me the room to experiment, and find a new format that I could refine over time.

    Then… yeah. Trump. Again.

    His return sent panic through the jobs market, making it suddenly much more difficult to get the boring safe jobs in University admin that I’ve been relying on for the last couple of decades. But it also gave us Vichy Tech, and the realisation that these unimaginably wealthy and powerful platforms like YouTube would soon be weaponised against us.

    Now, I just shared the video below in the Quiet Part Loud, but I’m sharing it again here to expand on a different point.

    It seemed clear that the internet of the big social platforms, which had become an increasingly toxic place anyway, was about to become actively hostile. Real life community was likely to become increasingly important, but so were smaller, more private online communities. Places where connections and relationships weren’t filtered through political gatekeepers.

    Figuring out how this might work was a challenge for my music projects. But it was maybe a bigger problem for my day job.

    Because I had been getting exasperated with working in university admin – perhaps unsurprising after 20 years, on and off. And I started to explore the idea of freelancing: specifically, using my day job background in communications and marketing to help Oxford researchers promote their research and their careers.

    So I’ve spent the last few months doing just that: talking to researchers about how to communicate in 2026. From my many years working at Oxford I’d developed some pretty firm ideas about what works and what doesn’t. Ideas that tend to differ quite considerably from what the University tends to consider as best practice (and what I tend to consider is at least 10 years out of date).

    As I’ve been pitching my theories, however, about the dangers of dependence on platforms that might be politically weaponised, and about the challenges of posting online regularly when you have hardly any time, and about the challenges of staying in touch with your followers when Zuckerberg wants you to pay for that privilege… I started to realise that I was also talking to myself.

    I started to see the parallels between university researchers and purveyors of super-niche historical music.

    Maybe the monthly email newsletter, which I had really just kept going for fun all these years (10 years this March, incidentally!), was actually the one thing to focus on. Or rather, maybe it was the combination of an email – which goes out to your audience rather than waiting for them to come to you – and a personal website, where you put whatever kind of content you want.

    I suppose I was considering this for a while, but wasn’t really sure whether to commit to it.

    And then one day I was idly thinking about what it was I wanted from making music. I knew – I’d always known – how to build a career as a musician: you move to London, play a lot of gigs, pay attention to the audience and adjust your material until they love it. Then you get a manager and it all builds from there. I knew that, but I didn’t want to do it. That’s the same way to build and grow a YouTube channel, incidentally, but again I didn’t want to do it.

    Why not? Because for me the whole point of these projects was to realise the music in my head, not tailor it for an audience.

    Then I realised: these last few years I’ve been trying to be a semi-professional musician or a YouTuber, but I’ve been doing it wrong because what I want is to be neither of those things. I want to be an artist – that’s the technical term for someone who isn’t interested in ‘market fit’.

    And here’s the thing about being an artist: the whole point is to avoid formulas and quick workflows, and to come up with something totally new and original. That takes time. That takes a ton of time. And it will basically never leave time for marketing, or promotion.

    You just can’t do both.

    But the one thing that artists can do, so long as they’re happy with a small audience, is just make the best art they can, and put it out in the world whenever and however they can, and hope that word of mouth spreads. If it doesn’t, the art probably isn’t good enough yet.

    That was the thing that clicked for me, and made me realise that platforms like YouTube and Bandcamp might be where I host my stuff, but I really need to focus on the email/website combo rather than appeasing an algorithm.

    Oh, and I actually need to make some art!

    I mean… that’s the other big problem. I don’t think I’ve made anything I would consider art in many years. I haven’t had time, because I’ve been foolishly been trying to get the marketing funnel set up first. Maybe that’s why the writer’s block as lasted so long – I just hadn’t been giving myself the opportunity to practice?

    Anyway, I feel like I know what I’m doing now.

    But I have a lot of catching up to do.


    So What Have We Learnt?

    I moved the email newsletter to the website so that I wouldn’t be dependent on any online platform.

    But I also did it because it lets me do this:


    Ask me things

    If you have any questions then seriously, do please leave a comment or drop me a message here. About life. About the universe. It’s never been easier!

    Photo Credits

    • Click on the images to see the originals. (It just means less admin for me this way.)
  • Minneapolis, Davos and Adam Mosseri’s bleak future

    Minneapolis, Davos and Adam Mosseri’s bleak future

    THE QUIET PART LOUD

    So, 2026: new format, new ideas, new regular feature.

    In the days after Trump was elected, I made this video:

    TL:DW is that I can see a fundamental obstacle to being an artist under an authoritarian regime: either you make your art about what the regime is doing, in which case they kind of win, or you ignore it, in which case you are tacitly treating it as normal, in which case you are tacitly endorsing it, in which case they win.

    I feel like it’s difficult to have something to say, however small your audience, if you’re not addressing the rampaging elephant in the room. But it can’t be the only thing you have to say. As we say now: joy is resistance.

    So I want to pull all my thoughts on the current state of world politics into a regular, but separate, article which readers can dip into if they’re interested, but which they can just avoid if they want to.

    This is the Quiet Part Loud.

    Part 1 – Minneapolis: the seeds of the US resistance movement?

    January 2026 feels like a turning point. Although feelings can be deceptive, because thinking back it also feels like every single month for at least a year and a half is some kind of turning point.

    The year began with a dramatic escalation from the Trump administration, and I’m not going to list all the drama. However, out of all of it I think the world’s gaze has turned to the ICE occupation of Minneapolis.

    And just to add this explanation once again: whilst this is a domestic US crisis, the US is still effectively the global bank, police officer, court and media provider, so I believe we should all pay attention.

    I want to start by focusing on a disagreement between two influential American historians. Professor Heather Cox Richardson, who I have recommended in my newsletter, has writes a daily letter explaining the current US crisis in terms of its history, and it is read by over a million followers on Substack.

    In this recent video she urged her followers to put pressure on congressional Republicans, but right now only they have any power.

    Enter rising star Tad Stoermer.

    He is also a scholar of American history, but specifically resistance history: those times when effective resistance movements were built and changed the countries political direction.

    His latest video responds explicitly to Richardson, and other moderates, who are suggesting that Americans just need to appeal to the better nature of an openly fascist government in the middle of an uninterrupted power grab.

    He is utterly scathing.

    The TL:DW of this is that history tells us no attempt to appease or persuade a tyrant has ever worked. Ever.

    And to suggest that only congressional Republicans hold power now is to basically give up on democracy. Power exists beyond congresses and parliaments. Citizens can resist, agitate, push back, put the regime under pressure.

    Stoermer makes the point that finally we’re seeing this in the United States, in Minneapolis.

    But there is such a stark, shocking disconnect between the cowardice and inertia of the Democrat leadership and the energy and activism on the ground.

    About an hour ago, YouTube just fed me a great example of this: an interview with a community organiser.

    Aru Shiney-Ajay describes how they all can feel the fear of living in a military occupation, but the amount of solidarity, compassion, organisation and community is like nothing she’s ever seen in over 10 years of activism.

    Citizen patrols are walking the streets, and when they see ICE operatives they message their Signal chats, and then blow whistles, which summon more citizens, until eventually they outnumber ICE considerably, and the ICE abduction is aborted.

    Now.

    I don’t want to suggest that’s American fascism over with. It’s barely begun. But I find it hard to imagine these citizens will go back to normal after this. Once they are routinely risking their lives for each other, the desire to avoid conflict in case ‘things get bad’ is gone.

    A smart government might try to roll this military occupation back, and try it incrementally at a slower pace when the country isn’t watching.

    This is not a smart government.

    And, although it is still early days, there are some who are saying that Trump has already lost ‘the Battle of Minnesota’.

    Here’s Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times:

    I’ll round up this section by taking a little detour.

    There’s a creator I’ve been following – a trans academic studying the far right whose social media handle is Nope Brigade – whose videos have been getting more and more… well, terrified.

    After the Charlie Kirk assassination, they said they were contemplating fleeing the US. Then they said they had decided it was time.

    And then they stopped posting. For weeks.

    Every now and then I’ve typed ‘Nope Brigade’ into my search, but nothing new came up.

    Then, a few days ago, they posted this:

    I try to remind myself, when I find myself drawn from the safety of my sofa into who is winning the sport of right vs left, that the horror has already begun for so many people.

    We still have time to stop that horror spreading to the UK. But that time will soon run out.

    Part 2 – Even the masters of the universe are spooked

    The World Economic Forum held their annual event at Davos this month. By most accounts, the Trump crowd turned it into an absolute clown show. Here is a highlight reel:

    I found this video from US media’s favourite rich smart-arse professor Scott Galloway:

    I think Galloway is often funny, self-deprecating, insightful… but also a good representation of how the rich are living in a different reality.

    And I think he knows it. Indeed, that video is basically Galloway talking about how none of these ‘masters of the universe’ – politicians, tech gurus, financiers, celebrities, etc. – really know what’s going on.

    He talks about a sense of unease they all have. Like what’s coming next is going to be bad for everyone.

    That surprised me for some reason. I suppose I imagined that it would all be a bunch of ashen-faced minions sitting round a big table while a masked chairman taps his fingers together and says “Goood… everything seems to be going to plan…”

    Once again, it makes me feel like the big story of the moment is not about a bunch of Silicon Valley geniuses overthrowing democracy, or a Republican party full of mannequins being operated by unknown billionaires.

    It’s about a political establishment of what David Graeber called ‘extreme moderates’ who will do anything, will cross any moral or legal line, to appease their opponents. Leaving their opponents victorious… but confused and disorientated. Like naughty children desperate to know where the boundaries are.

    Let’s talk about those Silicon Valley geniuses though. Let’s talk about the modern media landscape.

    Part 3 – They shoot horses, don’t they?

    On New Year’s Eve, Head of Instagram Adam Mosseri published a blog post about his predictions for the future of the platform. And everyone’s been talking about it.

    I’ve seen a bunch of creators complement him for his honesty and insight, and discuss how to tweak their content strategies going forward.

    But for those of us who have decided to get off that ship and paddle to our own little open-web island, he… well, he said the quiet part loud.

    Mosseri talks about his concern that AI slop will soon flood Instagram, and it will become impossible to establish what is real.

    He suggests that, now more than ever, the creators who can be real, authentic, transparent and consistent will be the ones who stand out.

    So what’s the problem with that?

    First of all, he is describing a problem that is very much of his own making, as Allison Johnson of The Verge points out.

    But basically, his point is…

    Yes, we have already enshittified our platform so badly that it’s like a bearpit down there. And this new AI technology (which Instagram’s parent company Meta is heavily invested in) will make it much much worse. And despite Meta being one of the 10 wealthiest companies on the planet, we have decided not to invest any money in restricting or labelling AI content or generally making our platform a more pleasant place to be.

    No. That is all on creators now: our dutiful little gig economy workers.

    You just need to work harder, pedal faster, dance more frantically. You just need to study your analytics, outcompete your peers, and never take a day off.

    And you need to be more authentic, more real. You need to put more of your actual life, your actual emotions, your actual soul into our disposable empty calorie snackable content.

    Because even though you personally don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of making a sustainable income on this platform, we can at least take all of that personal data from your content and sell it to advertisers, which is how we keep the steamroller rolling.

    It reminds me of the novel / movie They Shoot Horses Don’t They, about a real life Squid Game in 1920s America where contestants had to basically dance to death for a cash prize, and the entertainment of the crowd.

    But the backlash is already brewing.

    Something The Verge has been talking/writing about a lot lately is that the big tech platforms have now all utterly lost the trust of the public. Any sense of the benefit of the doubt is now gone.

    I’ve been thinking a lot about this interview I saw recently of comedian Chris Gethard, talking about the ‘Creator Apocalypse’.

    Everyone talks about the creator apocalypse all the time, but he had some excellent points I hadn’t heard before.

    He points out that the big tech platforms are now selling the idea of ‘being a DIY artist’ as a reason to use their platforms.

    And because the frog has been boiling for a while, we haven’t really noticed that any trace of a real DIY artist culture was ground out long ago.

    The platforms have used this as an excuse to pass all of the work and all of the expense onto the creators, who they make fight for tiny bits of attention, which the platforms can dial up and dial down at will with their algorithms.

    Lots of this great discussion resonated with me, but I want to highlight this excellent point:

    The platform algorithms will boost anyone talking about the problem. But they will suppress any talk of the solution.

    Gethard also talks about how the big tech platforms operate like the company store in an Appalachian coal mining town. They pay you in their own currency (‘scrip‘) that isn’t usable anywhere else.

    Conclusion

    So all of that is pretty bleak.

    But yet… here I am. On my own website. Back on the open web, and this time with a convert’s zeal.

    Because, for all the nihilism of the plutocrats right now, we do still have incredibly powerful tools for communicating with each other.

    I’ll end this very long rant (“If I had more time I would have made it shorter…“) with the video that inspired me to jump ship.

    In this talk to South By South West, independent journalist Molly White reminds us that… “You know that websites are still a thing, right?”