Blog

  • August 2026: Kindness and Cunning

    All you need is…

    August 2026

    Kindness and Cunning

    So that was summer, folks! I found it absolutely exhausting, perhaps because in large part it was seven weeks of childcare on top of working two part-time jobs. Not terrible by any means, but exhausting. And hot, obviously.

    Speaking of which, this month I’m going to grapple with faint climate change optimism (feel free to skip that if it’s a topic you don’t have the emotional bandwidth for right now).

    Other than that, it’s mainly celebrating some iconic musicians of yesteryear, because that’s been how it’s been.

    Nothing to add on a personal front, really, because I haven’t had time to focus on anything. (Except doomscrolling.)

    But enough burying the lead. Let’s talk about Dolly.


    Obituary

    RIP DOLLY PARTON

    A number of icons died in quick succession recently: Tim Curry, Yayoi Kusama, and of course Dolly Parton.

    Each of them leaves a big hole in our popular culture, but we all know Dolly was something else.

    I tend to feel that when someone dies over the age of, say, 75… at least they lived a full life. However, Dolly Parton was still contributing to culture in a big way. Her funding of the Moderna vaccine. Her support for the Black Lives Matter movement. And of course, the continued funding of her Imagination Library project.

    I’ll write a bit more about that side in a moment, but I just want to focus on my obsession: songwriting.

    I was just singing 9 To 5 to myself, and when I got to “working 9 to 5, for service and devotion” I thought, as I often do, wait – what does that actually mean? You’re working for service and devotion? Does that mean anything?

    And then I remembered that “for service and devotion” is actually the beginning of the next line: “For service and devotion, you would think that I would deserve a fair promotion.”

    Silly me for second-guessing Dolly Parton’s songwriting skills.

    Many great songwriters will throw in lines that don’t mean anything but sound kind of cool. (Looking at you, Nick Drake.) The greats of American country music never never never do that. Every line is load-bearing.

    They might try to use as few syllables as possible. They might nod respectfully to their framed icon of Hank Williams on the wall, and try to write in the most plain, accessible, easy-to-understand language that they can.

    But everything needs to mean something. Everything needs to have a point.

    People keep covering, and will continue to cover, Jolene, 9 To 5, I Will Always Love You and her other classics because she always had something to say, and it’s usually something that continues to be relevant.

    Recommended

    TAP

    One thing this newsletter has demonstrated over the years is that YouTube is good at taking algorithmic swings at something I didn’t know I needed.

    By the 1980s the culture of tap dancing – which had been a powerhouse of American popular culture in the early to mid 20th century – was very much on the wane.

    Nobody really cared about Sammy Davis Jnr and the other icons of that era.

    But Gregory Hines did. The last carrier of the torch, he and his brother dazzled the movie-goers in Frances Ford Coppola’s The Cotton Club (1984), and that gave him an acting career outside of tap dance.

    He died way too young, but he did manage to get this film made where, in this scene, he brings out all the greats and reminds you just how talented they were.

    Now, you might not give a shit about tap dancing – that’s okay, most people don’t. But what’s happening in this scene is something else, I think.

    Look at how old these people are! These people are old. These people are really really old.

    And look at the extraordinary precision that they can still get from their bodies.

    I find this one of the most uplifting movie scenes to deal with ageing. If any of these people had to do a gruelling world tour for six months, at that age, it would probably kill them. But get them in a room with their friends, and the talent is there, and the joy is there, and the decades of learning is there.

    And it’s just fucking great.

    Recommended

    FRANÇOISE HARDY

    Another icon who passed away recently (at the age of 80).

    She was a queen of the French 1960s pop music scene, influenced by The Beatles and English language pop music but still très français.

    This was one of her biggest hits, and a long-favourite of mine – I was amazed to recently find there was actually a music video for it. And goddammit if she isn’t every bit as cool and stylish as they said she was.

    Not hard to see why Mick Jagger was totally obsessed with her.

    Recommended

    TOM SCOTT on BLETCHLEY PARK

    OG YouTuber and one of the Internet’s favourite nerds, Tom Scott officially retired from his weekly YouTube video routine a few years ago, and (literally) flew off into the sunset.

    He’s clearly had a good break, because now he’s back, and moving ever closer to the sort of BBC Four documentaries I used to love watching.

    In fact, I think he very much has that David Attenborough / Michael Palin energy – which (as H will attest to) is pretty much the highest praise possible from me.

    Here he is on a tour of Bletchley Park, talking to the guides and historians and getting some fascinating insights.

    I mean, I am a middle-aged Englishman so this stuff is crack to me, but still, highly recommended.

    Recommended

    WINK & YOU MISS IT

    Listening to Say You’ll Be There by the Spice Girls the other day, I was reminded that in the 1990s there was a synthesiser that everyone seemed to be obsessed about.

    In fact, throughout the 80s and 90s there were two drum machines and one synth that basically became their own genres, and they were all made by the same company. They were: the Roland TR-808, the Roland TR-909… and the Roland TB-303. (Daft Punk’s first album had all three, and little else.)

    Fatboy Slim’s first single was actually called Everybody Needs A 303, and after that it was everywhere.

    But I think Norman (Fatboy Slim) Cook probably took his inspiration from this track I’m recommending: the national anthem for a particular kind of UK Raver.

    Higher State of Consciousness by Josh Wink.

    I think this was the first track that was about the 303. The focus is this keyboard riff that just loops, over and over, getting progressively more insane.

    Also, I love the video which was filmed at a music festival just down the road in Otmoor. So even though it was a little bit before my time, it’s all kinds of nostalgia for me.

    This is the ‘official music video’, by the way. Not to be confused with the other 112 official music videos for this track that you can find on YouTube.

    Recommended

    PEAK FRANK DREBIN

    YouTube occasionally feeds me clips from the parody police show Police Squad, and it reminded me of this – which constantly squats rent-free in my mind.

    Technically from the movie The Naked Gun, this is the best kind of parody of detective noir fiction.

    Recommended

    LOST WEEKEND by PHOEBE BRIDGERS

    Still giddy, no doubt, from his success at the last Bastard Session in indoctrinating my entire family in the ways of drop dead by Olivia Rodrigo, Peter decided to try his luck again recommending the new Phoebe Bridgers album Lost Weekend – particularly this song.

    The tone reminds me a lot of Billie Eilish, who I’m a big fan of. But I’ve been so busy these last few weeks that I have dipped in and out of the album but haven’t really been able to get immersed in it. Hopefully that will come.

    But two things I love:

    I love the opening lines to this first song (and therefore the album):

    Crying in a suit and tie
    But you should see the other guy

    I also love this video, which is a ‘lyric video’ – something I never really saw the point of. ‘Either make a proper music video or don’t’ was perhaps my view.

    But I realise when I was a young lad (in the 1840s) we had cassette and CD booklets where we could read the lyrics to while listening to the song. (Sure, you can do that on Spotify, but it’s an audio platform and it never occurs to me.) So being able to hear the song and see the lyrics can help get the meaning – particularly as they stay on screen as they get added.

    Also, I initially thought this video would be lyrics over a photograph, but it’s actually a static video shot of fireflies (? other insects?) dancing in the beam of a laser over what looks like a Los Angeles flood control channel. Which seems to perfectly capture the mood.

    So… maybe lyric videos are good now?

    Upcoming Events

    Friday 11th September


    Saturday 24th October


    Dear Diary…

    So this was the summer where it felt like climate change went up a notch. Frankly, I think every summer recently has felt like that, depending on where you are in the world, but this was Oxford’s turn.

    The last big shock for me was actually the flooding of 2012 to 2014, which felt… I dunno, biblical. It just rained and rained, and I was living by myself on the boat, and it was a baptism of fire. Except it was water. And not a baptism.

    Anyway, here we are.

    My algorithmic feeds are like “Cool! You’re back on the climate collapse doom-scrolling? Here, shovel this down, you anxious little rabbit – we’ve got you on the platform for another hour at least…”

    That said, I’m actually starting to see a bit more reasons for cautious optimism than I have for a while. I don’t think climate change will make humans extinct: we’re extraordinarily resourceful fuckers.

    But of course, I might be wrong – and either way I do think it’s going to get rough in our lifetimes.

    Do you know about the geopolitical significance of the petrodollar, by the way? I feel embarrassed I didn’t learn about it sooner, because I realise now it’s the elephant in the climate change summit.

    Every country’s economy needs energy: for factories, hospitals, transport systems, homes, etc. And for the latter part of the 20th century, that energy tended to come from oil. Oil was always traded in US dollars – hence the ‘petrodollar’. So when oil-producing countries sold oil to the US they would get dollars in return, which they would frequently want to invest in the safest assets they could: US government bonds. It became known as ‘petrodollar recycling’, and was something of a virtuous circle for the US economy.

    But it all relied on oil. Particularly in key Republican-controlled US states, where oil is still critical to their major businesses: petroleum refining, oil-fired power generation, plastics, fertiliser, asphalt, lubricants, etc.

    Which meant that noises would occasionally be made about preventing climate change, but behind the scenes any meaningful action was sabotaged.

    Now of course, in the second Trump term, they’re saying the quiet bit loud: the US government is actively embracing fossil fuels as quickly and intensively as they can, and trying to crush clean energy, which they see as a ‘competitor’. Which is obviously bad.

    But, as I have said many times, they are also a bunch of clowns who are destroying US influence on the world stage by the day. They only have a few allies left, who are generally considered pariahs, and the rest of the world is trying to escape them, and the petrodollar, as quickly as they can.

    Enter China.

    Here is some good news:

    TLDR: China has long been obsessed with energy independence from the United States, and their considerable production of clean energy products has just been stepped up dramatically.

    And countries are snapping it up like… well, like there’s no tomorrow. Pakistan, for example, has been electrifying so quickly that in 2025, for the first time, more of its power was generated from clean energy (55%) than fossil fuels (45%).

    Yes that does still leave us with the problem of economic dependence on China. But if the planet is still habitable we can at least work that problem.


    So What Have We Learnt?

    I never liked the movie Cool Hand Luke. Even though it is considered one of Paul Newman’s greatest, and I’m a big Paul Newman fan.

    The movie is a little bit like The Shawshank Redemption, except the Powers That Be successfully grind the hero down and win. The fact that the hero finally accepts his fate is even pitched as kind of a happy ending. It feels like it was written by a prison governor.

    The title of the movie comes from a scene in which Newman is playing poker against all the prison tough guys, and he wins through sheer bluff, not having any good cards at all. He demonstrates that “sometimes even nothing can be a pretty cool hand”.

    I’ve been thinking about that line a lot in the last few days. If you want to see what making the best out of a bad hand really looks like, I think you’re much better off looking at Dolly Parton.

    She has spoken an interviews about how a bank teller had a crush on her husband, and her husband had a crush on the bank teller, and he was spending more and more time at the bank and that was the inspiration for the song Jolene. After she released that song I imagine her husband got himself in check pretty quick.

    Apparently the same day that she wrote Jolene, she wrote arguably her most famous song.

    At 21 years old, she had become a co-host on the TV show of extremely influential country singer Porter Wagoner. In 1973 she wanted to leave to start her own solo career, and he threatened to sue her if she did.

    She left, but as she did she released the song I Will Always Love You, and dedicated it to him. He did sue her, he won, and she eventually paid him many years later, but the audience was absolutely on Dolly’s side. (Footnote: when Wagoner was old and sick and broke and dying, Dolly bought back his publishing rights that he had sold, gave them back to him so they would support his children, and stayed with him in hospital till the end.)

    Then of course there was the time when Elvis wanted to cover the song, and she was delighted. But ‘Colonel’ Tom Parker wanted her to give up half the rights for the privilege. And, in her characteristically charming way, she said no thank you, go fuck yourself.

    When Whitney Houston eventually turned to the song into the biggest hit of the 1990s, thanks to her movie The Bodyguard, you might expect there to be jealousy and animosity. Dolly heaped praise on Whitney’s version, however, and invested the royalties into numerous good causes.

    I mean, I could go on, obviously.

    But the main thing the obituaries have been reminding me is that she had (in spades) the two most important virtues we all need for navigating through this life.

    The first is kindness. The second is cunning.


    Ask me things

    If you have any questions then seriously, do please leave a comment or drop me a message here. About life. About the universe. About geoengineering. Because, I mean, we’ll have to eventually, won’t we? Anyway, that’s a whole other can of worms…

    Photo Credits

    • Click on the images to see the originals. (It just means less admin for me this way.)
  • July 2026: Overthrowing the Billionaire Class, and also pop videos

    These are a few of my favourite things.

    July 2026

    Overthrowing the Billionaire Class, and also pop videos

    As I look through this month’s recommendations, I see a distinct pattern. There is a crop of music videos – new and new-ish – which have caught my imagination, because I love me a music video. And also, surprise surprise, a bunch more stuff about social injustice, wealth inequality, and… just this sense in the air that the wheels are starting to come off for the powers that be. I know I write about that every month, but when you’re watching a car crash of this scale in slow motion, what else is there to write about? (Apart from, obviously, pop videos.)

    In other news, I am fucking knackered. Kind of working three jobs at the moment: temporary low-paying University admin work, setting up my freelance business, and joint summer holidays childcare (the most demanding job of the three). So… same sort of situation as for the last 2 or 3 years, basically. My life is a rigid schedule, because it has to be. In order to make sure I get my temp job done I need to get in the hours each week, and in order to make sure the childcare duties are split fairly I need to make sure I can handover at the right time. And then I still need to find time for all the other life admin, and occasional emergencies (like a huge chunk of my tooth chipping off yesterday and me needing emergency dental surgery).

    Sometimes I feel like I’m hovering close to burnout, but actually there are two things (other than family+friends) that help me feel like I’m still connected to joy in life, and they are: the monthly Bastard session… and this monthly newsletter. Giving myself one social musical piss-up, and one very low-maintenance creative project, each month is just enough to feel like I’m not losing those muscles completely.

    Everything else is still pretty much on pause.

    Which is perhaps why my current perception of the world around me is the heaviest of the heavy (ongoing political crisis) and the lightest of the light (music videos). Not really room for much else.

    So… er, yeah. Thanks for helping me stay sane! Shall we?


    Recommended

    DROP DEAD by OLIVIA RODRIGO

    The whole family is now obsessed with this song – especially my youngest. It has even supplanted HOT TO GO! by Chappell Roan (for now at least).

    I first heard this song covered at the Bastard Session, and the person who covered it shared it in our Discord. I watched the video, loved the song… but I kind of hated the video itself:

    I love the aesthetic: the low picture quality, the high frame rate, the aspect ratio, the colours, the lighting. But a video about ‘Isn’t Versailles great?!’ feels like a bad take in 2026, and it also feels very male-gaze-y.

    HOWEVER…

    Then I learned she made more than one video for it. And as far as I am concerned, THIS is the official video:

    Those my kin out there who have grainy homemade Canon Powershot videos of emo-infused pop songs somewhere on their hard drives, I see you.

    Recommended

    JOHNNY HARRIS & NEWPRESS

    Johnny Harris used to be a star reporter for the Vox YouTube channel, before going solo. I always thought he was talented, in a slick sort of way, but his journalism seemed to me to be style-over-substance. And he fell off my radar a bit.

    Now he’s back with grand theories about the future of journalism. Here he is on SubwayTakes:

    His take? Like the thumbnail above says, we should all stop consuming the news.

    SubwayTakes (which I wrote about last month) is all about coming out with the most outlandishly spicy take, and then fleshing it out with a genuinely thoughtful argument, and Harris makes a good case here. (Similar, in fact, to the SubwayTake I featured last time about how we need to consume less music.)

    Then, on Saturday morning, I found myself clicking on a video that I didn’t know was by Harris’s new media journalism company, Newpress.

    Really?! China ‘secretly’ saved the world last month? How is that not the worst kind of clickbait?

    Except that this isn’t clickbait. This is seriously good, important journalism.

    Do you remember back in April (of 2026) when pundits were saying that the closing of the Strait of Hormuz was going to create the worst oil shock in history? Far worse in the 1970s, which brought down the whole Breton Woods economic system? Whole cities would have to power down?

    What happened to that?

    This video makes the claim that the pundits weren’t wrong, but China did something extraordinary that it didn’t publicly announce, which has huge implications for, the global economy, the fate of Taiwan, and who rules the seas.

    On the basis of this video, I think Harris might be on to something.

    I think his SubwayTake is pretty compelling: news headlines (which are not the same as journalism) don’t tell you how the world works – they tell you how the world doesn’t work. They focus on aberrations, outliers, freak events – because that’s what gets attention. But they actually end up making their audience more confused, and less well-informed – and therefore more helpless, and more angry.

    I haven’t subscribed to Newpress yet, but if it is really able to deliver a regular big picture analysis of what happened last month – rather than a hyper-sensationalised take on what happened eight hours ago – I think I might.

    Recommended

    NEWS PANEL BAFFLED BY POPULARITY OF ROBIN HOOD

    This is a comedy skit taken from the comedy show Game Changer (I think?)

    And I personally feel like it is Peak Satire to the point where maybe we don’t need satire anymore. Maybe the job is done.

    (Note: to our transatlantic cousins, the definitive ‘ROB-in-hood’ is the Disney cartoon with animals instead of people.) (You know, animals instead of people to take the sting out of the subtext.)

    Recommended

    THE WRITING’S ON THE WALL (LEGO VERSION)

    OK Go are famous for their incredibly elaborate DIY music videos, usually filmed in one single unbroken take. The Writing On The Wall is perhaps one of their most famous.

    Well… here it is in LEGO:

    Recommended

    UNLEARNING ECONOMICS on WEALTH TAX

    If you’re interested in how wealth taxes might work in practice – and hey, y’know, even you aren’t, because I am clearly a shameless bore on this subject – this video from YouTuber Cahal Moran (aka Unlearning Economics) is a great deep dive into the different options on the table:

    • from Richard Murphy’s oven-ready taxes-on-wealth-that-aren’t-exactly-wealth-taxes (i.e. it’s all about the revenue, baby!)
    • to Gabriel Zucman’s global 2% on assets above €100 million (i.e. the super-rich pay the same relative amount as everyone else)
    • to Gary Stevenson’s national 2% on assets above £10 million (i.e. we need to stop aggressive acceleration of wealth concentration)
    • to Thomas Pikketty’s 0.1% global wealth tax (i.e. getting the super-rich to just declare their wealth is even more important than the revenue).

    There’s something there for everyone!

    Except, you know, Elon Musk, but, like, fuck him.

    Recommended

    GOD & THE BROKEN RIBS by JACK WHITE/LIAM LYNCH

    Once again, fulfilling my contractual obligation to point out a stunning Jack White music video every year or so.

    And I do mean the video – I like the song, but it’s really this beautiful take on visually representing the devil which is equal parts creepy and iconic. (The video is actually not by Jack White: it’s by American comedian/musician Liam Lynch.)

    This isn’t the whole song, just a clip. But give it a whirl, and tell me it’s an image that doesn’t stay with you…

    Recommended

    THE UPRISING

    Have you noticed how much people have started talking about guillotines in casual conversation? Post-Epstein Files particularly, the idea that ‘the guillotines are coming!’ just seems to be part of the public discourse now.

    Anyhoo, I see that Wat Tyler is getting a nice shiny new biopic…

    Upcoming Events

    Friday 14th August


    Dear Diary…

    So, once again, the story so far:

    Summer holidays: hovering around burnout. I’ve been in this situation pretty much since the pandemic ended, and the reason is because I spent most of my adult life trying to figure out how to make a career out of being a musician (specifically a composer) and almost a decade ago I found the solution: library music for film and television. Exactly what I wanted to do! Fit me perfectly. I knew it would be harder, and take longer, than it seemed, and I was right – it took me years before I started making any money. But I realised not long after the arrival of ChatGPT that AI would kill it.

    What I actually thought would happen was that the US government would see sense, recognise that these new AI products were destroying copyright, and would pass restrictive legislation to prevent them from just turning into plagiarising machines – but it would take about 5 years for that to happen, and business-to-business creative industries like library music would be decimated in that time. As soon as Trump got re-elected, however, I knew that meaningful regulation would never happen, and library music was a career dead-end for me – and also, you know, it was kind of the death of culture in the US, and any other country that complies with US law (such as the UK).

    So I’m in this precarious employment situation because the safest career option for music composers got nuked, just like every other musician’s career option has. And I’m still fucking sour about that. I battled through illness and then a pandemic to make the library music career work, and then governments just decided to kill copyright. What could I have done?

    The lesson I learned is that my society just simply doesn’t economically value new music enough for me to make a career out of it. Instead, I had to go back to my ‘musicians day job’ of university admin, and find some way to make a decent living out of that. Suboptimal when you’ve just started your sixth decade, but there we go. That’s the story so far.

    Anyway, this month has been all about the realisation that… I wouldn’t actually go back to making library music, even if it was an option. In fact, I don’t like the idea of music ever being my main job. I don’t actually think being a professional musician suits me.

    Not because I have given up on music – the opposite in fact: I care about it too much for it to be my main job. Here are some of the reasons why:

    1. I need a life to write about!

    I don’t want the story to be about the story. I think when we’re young us musicians can spend all our free time doing music and still have plenty to write about, because so much life, so much story is happening to us. We don’t need to preempt it. But as we get older, and settle into our niches, life happens to us less. And I find that if I spend all my time indoors recording music, barely any life happens at all.

    2. We all need something we do to switch off

    I didn’t want to do music because that was the least intolerable way of making an income. I never had a problem with working in an office. In fact, the social aspect has always been good for me, I think. I wanted to music because it was the thing I enjoyed doing the most. Now, with any project there will be times when it will be less enjoyable, but when you’re relying on it to pay the bills the whole dynamic changes. It becomes stressful, and you need something to switch off to. I want music to be the thing which I switch off to.

    3. The dream just for music to pay for itself

    Now, I would still love to write and record music, and the dream is to one day find a way to make some money from it. Money helps expand what you can do, but it also helps you find an audience – because it means you can’t just make music that you like: it has to be something other people are prepared to pay for. This takes you outside your own creative bubble, which I have learned is something I want.

    Slight problem: people don’t pay musicians for music anymore, so my next project (sigh) is going to have to be to see if I can innovate the business model. If I can’t… then at least I tried. If I can then I imagine that ‘a business model for selling your own music that actually works’ would probably be more interesting to people than my actual music, but I’d be fine with that.

    4. The fundamental economics of selling music

    While we’re on the subject…

    Over the last couple of decades, all roads have ultimately led me back to this point. Music is a uniquely difficult thing to sell, and it’s not just the capitalism of it all. All musicians making new music are competing with Mozart, Nina Simone, The Beatles… Their music is not new, but it’s always new to a new generation of music fans. This is a creative industry where supply has outstripped demand for centuries, ever since printed sheet music. And if music is your sole income (rather than a side hustle that pays for itself) then you live in such financial uncertainty that you have to make the safest of artistic choices. I think you can make better music if you don’t have that uncertainty.

    5. I don’t need more temptations to go into Hermit Mode

    This is maybe the biggest reason, and I’m really noticing this as I’m having to network for the freelance job – and enjoying it. The part of being a musician I enjoyed the most was the solitary business of composing. But I have a tendency to be too solitary, and to go long periods of time without speaking to anyone. This is much less of a problem now I’m married with children, but it’s not gone completely. Perhaps this is really just an extension of having a life to write about.

    6. I’m not built for touring

    If you want to avoid Hermit Mode, and you want to socialise more, there is of course one way musicians of all stripes can make money (just about), and that is touring. But I am not built for touring! I know that that kind of routine would tip me into depression in a heartbeat.

    6. And I never liked the culture of the music business

    Being a musician who socialises doesn’t have to be that intense, of course. Being a successful music composer also requires networking. But I have never felt comfortable networking inside the music business, and I recently realised why. The mainstream music business is a fashion business that pretends to be an art business. The audience that pays for fashion is generally young, and has money to spnd. If fashion is what you’re really selling then you need to pay a lot of attention to your appearance, and how you present visually. No matter how old you are.

    Now, confession time: I went to an artsy boarding school, which is often seen as a training ground for media. So every time I found myself networking in the music business, it felt like being back at school. Except I was an adult, and not a young one. And… neither was anyone else I encountered. So it just felt so childish to me, like I’d regressed back to being a teenager.

    7. But we have a common enemy!

    That said, I get it! The music business and I have a common enemy: the economics of selling music. You need to make money somehow, and if the only viable option is selling young, hot, wealthy artists to young, hot, wealthy fans then that’s what the business will look like. And it’s much easier to do that if you don’t care obsessively about the music itself. If you want to sell the art not the fashion then you’re competing with the Mozarts who died penniless.

    Right now, despite how exhausting it all is, I’m enjoying pursuing a separate day job – one that has elements of creativity, but that I can eventually switch off from at the end of the day.

    7. Having said all that…

    Let’s be realistic, this is exactly the kind of thing I could completely change my mind about in six months. Maybe this is just sour grapes, and I’d jump at the opportunity if I genuinely thought it was available. I would need quite a bit of convincing though. And really, I think the solitary nature of composing is the big thing for me at the moment. I don’t think it’s healthy for me to give myself a reason to sit still for 40 hour a week and not speak to anyone.


    So What Have We Learnt?

    The main thing I learned this month was the thing above about dreaming about my music one day paying for itself, but not being my main job.

    The second thing how lucky I am to be married to someone who has watched so much medical drama that she’s basically a doctor. Which means that when I get shingles or my tooth splits in half she knows what I need to do to make sure it’s resolved as quickly as possible.

    The other thing… is about fucking AI. Again.

    About something that I like about fucking AI. Again.

    I haven’t been in a position to actually record music for a long time – for that I need unbroken blocks of free time, which I just don’t have now. But from time to time I have been able to write down and explore ideas about what my next musical projects might be.

    And in doing so I’ve found something that AI is really good for – and that is a huge task that I have found so overwhelming for the last twenty years or so:

    • organising my traditional music sources.

    First, let’s do the dance again:

    • AI is primarily being used as a plagiarism machine,
    • it is starving resources from communities around the world in order to service its data centres,
    • it is a massive bubble that will soon probably crash the US stock market and send shockwaves through the world,
    • and just because CEOs are starting to realise they can’t fire everyone and replace them with AI doesn’t mean they won’t keep trying to do it again every time AI looks like it might be ready.

    With that said…

    Finding traditional English songs that are interesting to modern ears is not, in my opinion, a needle in a haystack. It’s a needle in the UK agriculture industry’s annual grain output. The scale of the project is huge, and up to now I have only been able to note down sources that I’ve happened to stumble upon. Often the same sources every trad musician stumbles upon.

    AI chatbots can search through, analyse and re-contextualise the works of all our favourite modern artists, but they can also search ‘traditional’ (i.e. out of copyright) works too. And I’m finding this fascinating.

    Being able to search through pretty much every traditional ballad readable on the internet by incredibly specific theme, for example, was unthinkable just a few years ago. Being able to cross-reference historical works instantly, and try to get a sense of what was popular then rather than what’s popular with historians now… that would have been work that took academics years. If an LLM is just seen as a search tool that actually understands the language of its index, that’s a pretty big deal.

    And it wasn’t LLMs that killed my library music gig, whether I want it back now or not. It was a bunch of billionaires who decided to kill copyright, and who have been successful at it. For now, at least.


    Ask me things

    If you have any questions then seriously, do please leave a comment or drop me a message here. About life. About the universe. About why Robin Hood is so popular. (Apart from him being a sexy fox, which is actually perhaps the answer.)

    Photo Credits

    • Click on the images to see the originals. (It just means less admin for me this way.)
  • June 2026: What comes after Enshittification?

    Serious question.

    June 2026

    What comes after Enshittification?

    I’m thinking a lot about music at the moment, although still not really in a position to get back to making it. This month is mainly me thinking about… just the mountain of obstacles facing musicians right now, and how that is maybe a microcosm of everybody just trying to make a living. I realise I’m spending as much time daydreaming about building ‘digital public infrastructure’ for artists as I am thinking about actually making music. Because I’m old enough to remember systems that actually worked for musicians, and I’m wondering if the technology is straightforward enough to bring them back.

    I’m not saying anything new in suggesting our current political and economic systems are unsustainable. But week by week, month by month, I’m really getting the sense we are past a kind of public awareness tipping point – and in lots of ways, large and small, I feel like people are ready for something new.

    Which is handy because (just to pull things back to this email) I’ve got about six billion recommendations this month. Just like last month, actually. This time lot about older male role models for some reason. And a lot about America, which is obviously far away, but this month’s email is all about canaries in coal mines.

    No new music for me this month, and no other writings either. Still focused on starting that freelance business. It’s eating up all my time at the moment. Blah blah blah. It takes as long as it takes.

    When I haven’t really been up to much (or much that I would put in a newsletter) I tend to just muse on the state of the world, and that can often get a bit bleak – perhaps because I don’t want to feel I’m putting my head in the sand. But this month I am actually pulled towards cautious optimism.

    So…


    Recommended

    KEEP THE METER RUNNING

    This one’s a bit special and I’m going go long if you don’t mind.

    I love YouTube and I basically never watch television anymore – be that the BBC or even Netflix. YouTube has essentially unlimited variety, and you will never be short of things to learn, or of new perspectives.

    However, if I’m honest, it is rare that YouTube is able to reach the heights that television can at its best. YouTube creators don’t have the time and the budget to really tell big stories.

    You guessed it: until now.

    Kareem Rahma is the host and producer of arguably the most popular format on social media right now: SubwayTakes. More on that in a bit.

    Keep The Meter Running is his attempt (successful, in my opinion) to reach the heights of television on YouTube. This is a proper show – an event – rather than a discussion or a monologue about an event.

    The format is that Rahma gets into a New York taxi and says to the driver: take me to your favourite place, and keep the meter running.

    That’s a good format idea for some high jinx and shenanigans, but there’s a bit more going on here than that. In this interview, Rahma talks about having been just emotionally lost in recent years, and missing his father – an immigrant from Egypt who worked for many years as a New York cab driver. Rahma believes that New York cab drivers – usually immigrants, usually unbelievably hard-working, usually people who have seen some shit – can be vital male role models for the rest of us.

    This format isn’t just about getting some juicy real life clips that can be turned into Instagram Reels. He is genuinely looking for some life advice.

    And he’s also trying to show a different side of America, particularly New York. He maintains you can travel the world without ever leaving New York.

    New York seems to be having a bit of a moment right now – and Rahma’s support for Zhoran Mamdani during his mayoral election campaign might well have contributed to that.

    Anyway, I have no idea how Rahma is funding this new YouTube show. It doesn’t seem to have sponsors, and there’s no way YouTube ad revenue is ever going to pay him enough for this level of production value. So let’s enjoy it while it lasts!

    Recommended

    THE UNITED STATES ACCORDING TO CHINESE MOVIES

    I’ve recommended many videos from this channel (Accented Cinema) in the past. I’ve had a particular love of South East Asian movies since the 2000s and, although I’ve seen a lot of movies from Hong Kong, I don’t know much about cinema from mainland China.

    This video is a review of how modern Chinese culture sees the USA, as viewed through Chinese movies.

    And the TLDR is rather fascinating, I think.

    Many movies deal with American lack of interest and downright hostility to Chinese culture, particularly as experienced by Chinese immigrants, particularly concerning differences in family life. A few make fun of the dumb action hero machismo, and explicitly of Donald Trump.

    But the general feeling is actually that the USA is an exciting, culturally-diverse place full of open-minded people. And the open-minded part is really interesting, as many of these Chinese movies seem to use the United States to critique some of the more socially conservative aspect of Chinese life.

    Anyway, watch the video – it’s a good ‘un.

    Recommended

    KERMODE AND MAYO

    More on the older male role models here.

    I realise that I have been listening to Simon Mayo and Mark Kermode, on and off, for about 30 years. I first heard them when film critic Kermode had a slot on Mayo’s BBC Radio 1 show, and now they have their own YouTube channel where they talk about film, TV and culture more generally I think. They have quietly and steadily got better with age, in my opinion.

    I wanted to single out this video: not because of the film review, which is incidental, but because of the conversation between them.

    Kermode says that he wanted to like Steven Spielberg’s new movie more, but was ultimately left disappointed. Mayo (getting emotional) said he recognises the disappointing aspects, but still felt this was an important film because it was a celebration of empathy at a time when we badly need it.

    Kermode says this is why their show exists: because Mayo will balance his cynicism by saying things like that.

    And then they spend the rest of the episode talking about how much they love each other, basically. Which we all know men should do more, so here you go.

    Recommended

    INDE NAVARRETTE PLAYS LAST OF US

    If you want an indication of how Hollywood, and celebrity, is changing…

    This is a very standard type of YouTube video: a YouTuber films themselves playing a computer game (often for hours) and then just chats idly throughout it, giving you a much less filtered, much less ‘performed’ window into their lives.

    Except that this is the star of the film Obsession, which (along with Backrooms) became a smash Hollywood hit recently and beat the latest Star Wars film.

    Inde Navarrette is, in Hollywood terms, hot right now. Like, hotter than the surface of the sun hot. She’s doing a billion interviews, and probably fashion shoots and whatever else.

    But she is also having this incredibly unfiltered relationship with a huge audience.

    I’ve mentioned before about how canny politicians like Zack Polanski are bypassing mainstream media and building direct relationships with audiences with their own channels.

    I wonder if this is the future for Hollywood stars too.

    Recommended

    THE ATLANTIC’S AI DATASET SEARCH

    Can’t help but add a little more AI news, things being as they are.

    The Atlantic magazine has created a fun little figurative hand grenade which they have thrown into the Discourse™.

    It’s a publicly available database that allows anyone to search a creative work to see if it has been gobbled up by AI.

    I am nowhere near important enough to be in it. Which is… good? I guess?

    Recommended

    GEORGE CARLIN DUBS THOMAS THE TANK ENGINE

    Decades before the word ‘woke’ was appropriated and weaponised, George Carlin was the wokest and angriest white comedian in the US.

    Known to my generation is that nice old man from Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, he was a gateway to radical politics for dudes slightly older than me.

    Anyway, unrelated to all that, I was surprised and charmed to find that he had also done expletive-ridden voiceovers for the children’s TV show Thomas the Tank Engine.

    It’s a little hit and miss, but I did like the train that could make his cat defecate by pointing the TV remote at it and pressing the volume buttons.

    Recommended

    SEASICK STEVE

    There is something particularly mournful about a musician in his mid 70s singing about the season finale of America.

    They’re shutting the whole thing down
    All that’s left is the theme song

    I’m currently in a slightly optimistic frame of mind when it comes to the direction of world politics. But he’s right that it’s the end of the America he used to know.

    And, good or bad, will he live to see the next one?

    Upcoming Events

    Friday 10th July


    Dear Diary…

    Let’s start with the bad news.

    The market value of what musicians make (i.e. music) seems to have declined steadily since the arrival of Napster. And it was never that great to begin with.

    But pirating reduced it to zero. iTunes brought it up to 0.99 per track. Spotify changed the game again, offering musicians £1 for around 300 streams – which, for context, means 1 million streams will pay you a little over £3,000.

    Spotify changed the game in more ways than one, of course. It became the only game in town if you wanted to get your music distributed. If you wanted enough money from streaming to pay the bills then you needed to satisfy their recommendation algorithm – and so musicians get flattened into being ‘content creators’.

    But there was always money from touring. Until the ticket companies and the venue owners got consolidated into one glorious monopoly, and the musicians started to get squeezed there too.

    And then along came AI.

    These days musicians are being told to accept that yes, their music will be used against their will to train generative AI, which will ultimately replace them – or at least flood the market to the point where… well, musicians aren’t really needed by society at all anymore.

    Now the good news.

    Nilay Patel, editor in chief of tech website The Verge, often talks about how the music business is always the canary in the coal mine for the media at large. The way that musicians get screwed today will tell you how everyone will get screwed in about five years.

    Or… maybe not. Because, to the surprise of nobody outside Silicon Valley, everyone hates AI, and everyone hates AI music.

    Yes, people are listening to it, often in Spotify playlists of background music. But if all we have to eat is mouldy bread, a lot of people will eat mould. That doesn’t mean they like it.

    To me, it feels to me like we might have passed a tipping point of enshittification – in media, in social media, and particularly in music.

    Of course I could see why Spotify became so dominant. It was just so convenient! All the music in one place for a monthly subscription. Sure it didn’t pay artists much, but it paid more than piracy, and it removed so much friction.

    But now, as a lover of music, the experience from Spotify and the industry at large is just… bad. And keeps getting worse. It’s clear that no one on the business side of music really cares about music. It’s just a handful of cartels, and no one really needs to try anymore.

    Here’s the thing: if someone wanted to bring a bit of friction back, I think as a consumer I’d be happy with it. I would rather go back to some kind of iTunes model where I pay around £1 for a track which I then own. I wouldn’t need to pay a monthly subscription for an increasing mountain of slop.

    I feel differently about ‘convenience’ and ‘friction’ now. It just doesn’t seem as attractive anymore. There’s a reason why cheap all-you-can-eat buffets didn’t make restaurants redundant.

    And I’m clearly not alone in this sentiment.

    Let’s come back to the man of the moment, Kareem Rahma, and the hottest property on social media right now: SubwayTakes.

    This was the clip that set me off on this little internal mini-rant.

    Because it’s a discussion that mirrors what I’ve been feeling.

    10 years ago it seemed like streaming was here to stay and we would never go back to paying for digital media, never mind physical media. Even if the alternative was better for musicians, and a more sustainable ecosystem. Each listener would have to make a sacrifice of convenience to help musicians, and how realistic was that?

    Now it’s not a sacrifice. Now these old-fashioned forms of media can offer you something that Spotify can’t: control. You can use an uncluttered, non-distracting interface that doesn’t feel like it hates you. You can build your own library without having to pay rent for it. You can choose to not spend any money on music for the next few months if you want to. And you can gift music to other people as a present, which is something I really miss.

    Where is this utopian neo-luddite technology going to come from though? Are iPods going to start selling again?

    Well, it’s early days, but one reason why music might be the canary in the coalmine could be that musicians are surprisingly resourceful fuckers. From punk to early hip-hop to proto-grunge, there have been many occasions when musicians have bypassed the music industry and managed to build large audiences. Usually all it takes is for one music scene to really commit to the idea and give everyone else a proof of concept.

    Initially I was wondering why we haven’t seen this DIY movement in musicians for decades, but then it occurred to me that since Napster there has been been one long continuous DIY movement on social media. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and TikTok initially seemed to be enabling musicians, artists, entertainers and journalists. It was helping us all get around the gatekeepers.

    In the last few years, however, it’s become clear that they are simply the new gatekeepers. And they’re worse than the last ones, because these software-brained CEOs are way too high on their own optimising supply to realise that they are destroying the media ecosystems that their businesses depend on.

    So, my prediction: the thing we call ‘tech’ has become essential to modern life, and it’s not going anywhere, but I suspect as a society we’re going to move away reliance on the increasingly enshittified Silicon Valley tech companies – because it was only ever convenience that bound us to them, and that convenience is rapidly vanishing.

    And if history is anything to go by, musicians might once again be the canaries in the coal mine here.

    Better technology already exists! We just need people to tinker and share.


    So What Have We Learnt?

    My sense is that positive change is coming, in so many areas in so many ways, but it’s easy to forget how much it is still early days.

    I mentioned a tipping point in the way we relate to music. I think globally there has been a much wider tipping point, where the number of people who feel that our systems are fundamentally broken has now become the majority.

    The desire for fundamental change seems like it has reached a critical mass.

    Because when everyone believes that society’s systems are imperfect and run by leaders who should know better, nothing really changes.

    However, when everyone believes those same systems are being aggressively weaponised against them, they start to organise.

    I’m seeing so much grassroots political organising at the moment. And so much development of digital public infrastructure – particularly in Europe.

    Now, let’s be realistic: shit’s still pretty bad right now though. And there is still plenty of room for it to get worse.

    But, with each month that passes, I get an increasing sense that our technofeudal overlords don’t really know what the fuck they’re doing.

    And there’s a new generation of community builders who don’t exactly know what they’re doing, but they’re fast learners.

    Maybe I’m totally wrong about all of this.

    But we need to focus our attention on something, and this is where my attention is now.


    Ask me things

    If you have any questions then seriously, do please leave a comment or drop me a message here. About life. About the universe. About what digital public infrastructure for artists, or indeed anyone, looks like. Seriously, ask me – I’m keen to talk to anyone who wants to talk about this. Railways, telephones, even electricity started out with competing private companies until citizens decided they were too important, and we needed public alternatives. The future starts now, baby.

    Photo Credits

    • Click on the images to see the originals. (It just means less admin for me this way.)

  • May 2026: The Architect of my own Misfortune

    May 2026: The Architect of my own Misfortune

    Overthinking is underrated.

    May 2026

    The Architect of my own Misfortune

    I’m just coming out of a long period of stress and overwork. As I wrote about at length in the last few newsletters, it was a combination of child illness and job uncertainty, and a tiresome rerun of the same period exactly a year earlier. I’ve also written about how, once upon a time, this was a newsletter was about making music, but it has become about how to get back to a point where making music is even possible. Artistically, the biggest challenge I face these days is getting started on a project and then just getting buried for four months and not having the time to even look at it.

    However, right now the dust seems to have settled! When the dust has settled in the past I have frantically tried to do as many creative projects as I can. You might notice that this newsletter is a bit of a flurry of activity, but actually I’m trying not to repeat that pattern this time.

    What I’m currently trying to do is make sure I don’t spend the next few years in a constant cycle of worrying about when the current job contract ends, and getting completely blindsided every time the kids get ill. So even though I get to dip my toe back into making music (for my mental health mainly), it’s no more than that, for now at least.

    That said, this month is a lot. Eight recommendations and three blog posts.

    We’re covering everything from zines to wealth tax to Sherlock Holmes, via the Beach Boys and a large language model… from 1930. With blog posts about the end of an online golden age, being polite to AI chatbots, and why I might have been wrong about imminent US Civil War. And we’re also covering my favourite topic: writer’s block.

    Shall we?


    My Recent Blog Articles

    As I mentioned, there’s been a bit of a flurry of activity in terms of my writing.

    The first blog post is about how The Essay™ seems to be moving from video back to text – because video is too competitive, and text is so much quicker and easier to write. Which perhaps explains why, given a little bit more time, I’ve written a bunch of blog posts rather than anything else.

    The second post concerns a funny (peculiar not ha ha) issue that I’ve heard people discuss privately but I don’t see it covered much publicly: how polite should we be to AI chatbots?

    Finally, a return to The Quiet Part Loud, and a slightly more optimistic post: I think I might have been wrong about a US civil war or revolution before the end of Trump’s second term.


    Recommended

    GABRIEL ZUCMAN

    Okay, let’s start with the big one.

    Perhaps the most influential name in the wealth tax movement is French economist Gabriel Zucman. Scourge of the billionaires. Thorn in the side of the French government.

    Zucman is a protégé of Thomas Piketty – arguably the most influential economist of recent times (along with Joseph Stiglitz, who is also a Zucman fan) – and his new (and pleasingly concise) book is simply called We Need To Tax Billionaires.

    If you’ve read this newsletter before, you know this is something I’m boring about, but… why do we need to tax billionaires? So many reasons, many counter-intuititve, but fundamentally because billionaires (particularly those few plutocrats with hundreds of billions) are arguably more powerful than governments, and taxation is the most effective tool a democratic government has for reversing this.

    However, this book is more than a mission statement.

    In it he lays out the detailed plan for how a wealth tax would actually work. And he is in a good position to do this, having helped implement a similar plan which currently taxes corporations specifically (rather than their billionaire owners).

    He also gives evidence-based responses for all the usual questions: no, taxing billionaires alone will not fund a government, and yes, wealth taxes in the past didn’t work (because, as he points out, the billionaires were always somehow exempt!)

    His approach is known in France as, simply, the Zucman tax, and he certainly believes France will implement it relatively soon.

    If it does then I think it will globally change the wealth tax debate very quickly.

    Recommended

    FILMMAKERS SHOULD MAKE ZINES

    I’m not a filmmaker. And I don’t have the time or the patience to make zines.

    But I love the idea of both!

    (”What are zines?” DIY homemade magazines, basically, that have been popular in music subcultures for decades.)

    I have to be honest: I don’t think there’s going to be a huge physical media revival that eclipse is digital media. Digital media is just too convenient.

    But I think we need both, because physical media has properties digital media just doesn’t. It is tangible. It exists in the world.

    And seeing this filmmaker’s photographs assembled by hand into these gorgeous paper booklets really brings this home for me.

    Recommended

    NOTEBOOK-LM PODCASTS

    This is the first of a bunch of AI-related recommendations. Sorry folks, these are the times we are living in.

    Actually, they all fall into the same category of ‘trying to find good uses for this neutral tool that is being so actively weaponised against us by a bunch of man-baby billionaire dickheads’.

    Perhaps my favourite current AI tool is Google’s NotebookLM, because it will work with just the sources you give it. It answers questions, it make infographics… and, famously, it makes podcasts.

    I have mentioned this podcast feature in my recommendations before, but I’ve come back to it in a big way – although, as to be expected with two AI voices chatting with each other, there is an element of Uncanny Valley to it.

    But I realised recently that I could use it to search for online sources on the most complex and niche topics that I have wanted to understand for a long time but am unlikely to find a good primer for. Then I can feed those sources into this app, and have it to generate a 20 minute podcast which, I have to admit, is very very good at explaining complex topics in simple ways.

    I’ve learned about the history of computer programming from Assembly to Rust. I’ve learned about the history of the Swiss Democratic system. I’ve learned about the ‘100 schools’ of Chinese philosophy.

    If you want an introduction into a tricky topic, I highly recommend it.

    Recommended

    TALKIE LM

    This one is fascinating. And bonkers. And particularly exciting for history nerds.

    The bad news is it’s yet another AI chatbot. The good news? Here is the opening paragraph of the introductory blog article:

    Have you ever daydreamed about talking to someone from the past? What would you ask someone with no knowledge of the modern world? What would they ask you? While we don’t have time machines yet, we can simulate this experience by training, in Owain Evans’s phrase, ‘vintage’ language models: LMs trained only on historical text.

    Go check it out. It’s called Talkie LM particularly informative about cooperative movements, trade unions, and the kind of political machinery that fell out of faith in the late 20th century.

    Also fun for folk music too.

    Recommended

    AI POISONING CONTINUES…

    I’m still on the AI poisoning train, however, when it comes to music.

    And although I haven’t heard about any advances in technology, it’s nice to stumble on a video like this by a young creator seemingly as determined as I am to find ways to damage the AI models that are stealing from us.

    It feels like a movement that is picking up momentum.

    (Another reason why I like that Talkie LM, as it’s trained only on content in the public domain.)

    Recommended

    YVETTE YOUNG COVERS THE BEACH BOYS

    Yvette Young, who performs under the band name Covet, is a very particular kind of electric guitar player: the kind that gets their own signature model. (And with Ibanez too – the most underrated electric guitar manufacturer.)

    She plays very complicated, very technical instrumental Math Rock-influenced music that is constantly leaping keys and time signatures.

    This is a video where she is challenged to do a cover of Wouldn’t It Be Nice? by The Beach Boys in a few hours.

    And it’s just fun. She decides to make it 90s shoegaze.

    Recommended

    JEREMY BRETT: THE DEFINITIVE SHERLOCK HOLMES

    I think the dazzling reinvention of the Benedict Cumberbatch / Martin Freeman Sherlock made me forget that Jeremy Brett played the definitive Sherlock Holmes.

    I stumbled on this YouTube video recently.

    I think I had heard that Brett was obsessive about the role, but I had no idea what extent. It really did become all-consuming for him.

    In fact, he set out to make meticulously faithful television adaptations of every story, and came pretty close, but didn’t live long enough – perhaps due to how hard he worked through a number of serious health conditions.

    If you are even slightly a Holmes fan, this is well worth a watch.

    Recommended

    VOICE ACTOR EXPLAINS

    I have never seen the Netflix TV series Euphoria, although for this video – in which Tawny Platis (a professional voice actor) breaks down characters, their accents and how they use them – that might be an advantage.

    I had no idea that was that much detail.

    It’s a pretty impressive insight into both the talent of the actors and the insight of the voice actor analysing them.


    Upcoming Events

    Friday 12th June


    Dear Diary…

    So now I finally have a bit more time. And although I have a million things to do, making music is such a necessity for my mental health (it has taken me too long to learn that).

    Back to music means back to my incredibly complicated notes on all the incredibly complicated ideas I want to incorporate.

    Except that this time I have been away so long that they had all gone from my short-term memory. And for the first time in a very very long time, this felt liberating. Instead of taking refuge in complex structure, I felt like, this time, I might be able to just sit down and write.

    Here’s the thing: I have written a lot of professional library music, and although some of it was tricky to write, I would pretty much always be satisfied with the result. Yet whenever I tried to write music just for myself I would end up abandon it.

    So this time I just sat down and started writing, but with a different attitude: I wouldn’t expect to get it right straight away. I would just do a first draft, and accept it wouldn’t be perfect. Then I would move onto another one. But I would come back, see what could be improved, and then rinse and repeat until the track was done.

    So that’s what I did.

    Did it work?

    Of course it fucking didn’t.

    I haven’t been lost in complex structures for over a decade for no reason. And I feel like this detour helped me to understand what the reason has been.

    Thanks to years of making library music, it turns out I find it very easy to come up with ideas. I know I’ve quoted this Paul Simon line about a million times in this newsletter, but here it is again: writers’ block is not about ‘not being able to come up with ideas’: it’s about only being able to come up with ideas that let you down.

    I found it pretty easy to come up with ideas when writing professional library music, because they weren’t my ideas! I was just recycling other people’s.

    The music I have always wanted to write for myself is different. All my musical heroes have a sound. Sometimes many different sounds. It’s not about one or two new ideas: it’s about creating a whole sub-genre.

    I keep forgetting this and rediscovering it, but this month I came up with an analogy which sums it up, and which will hopefully remind me in future.

    It’s like I’ve always wanted to be an architect. One with my own original bold inventive style. It’s like I grew up loving architects, and studying them, and trying to work out why they made the choices they made.

    And eventually the way I decided to work towards becoming an architect was by starting out as a builder.

    I would work on construction sites and home renovations. And I would do this for years, to the point where you could put me into any situation and I would understand the engineering, the materials, the budget, the time-frame…

    But when I would start trying to build my own structures from scratch, I would always abandon them. I just couldn’t get them right.

    And the reason is because I was approaching them like a builder, and not like an architect.

    A builder implements someone else’s design, even if that means making a number of smaller design decisions.

    But an architect has to think about the whole system and how it fits together. That’s really the difference: it’s not just about solving problems, it’s about building systems that fit together.

    And an architect who wants to do something radically different has to do a great deal of work testing new potential systems to see where they might break down. Because if you don’t get them right in the planning stage, you’re not going to be able to fix them in the build.

    So, yeah, I think this is why I keep abandoning the music that I start. You can’t just spontaneously build a house by, like, putting up a front door and then seeing where inspiration takes you.

    Back to the drawing board.


    So What Have We Learnt?

    And now for something completely different. (Although it is also about learning how to stop abandoning things early.)

    This month’s revelation concerns why I’ve stopped watching television.

    Or, to be more specific, I have stopped watching narrative fiction on a screen at home. I will still very occasionally go to the cinema when I have time, but I don’t find myself watching movies or television shows at home. Netflix, Disney+, Apple TV and so on.

    I just haven’t been able to find anything that keeps me hooked. Occasionally I find something that’s interesting enough for me to watch maybe 10 minutes of, but no more than that.

    Well, I think I’ve found out why. And it’s nothing to do with the quality of the shows.

    On a whim, I decided to watch something on my desktop computer, sitting in my comfortable desk chair… but with the lights off.

    I was amazed to discover that, even though what I was watching was fairly trashy, I was able to get immersed in the story. Just like in a cinema.

    Really, that was all it took: sitting in the dark.

    Now that I’ve noticed what a difference the environment makes in my concentration, I’ve also noticed that I basically don’t read physical books anymore. It’s always an audiobook. But maybe, in a similar way, if I was to take the time to create an environment where focus is easy, that might be something I can get immersed in too.

    I don’t want to emphasise that this is not about smart phones being attention killers.

    I think it’s about new technology breaking good habits I let atrophy years ago that need to be rediscovered.


    Ask me things

    If you have any questions then seriously, do please leave a comment or drop me a message here. About life. About the universe. About how to mitigate the risk of interstitial condensation within the wall assembly, given the specified vapour permeability of the exterior rigid insulation and the calculated dew point location under the projected hygrothermal conditions for a building’s given climate zone. My fixed fees are very reasonable.

    Photo Credits

    • Click on the images to see the originals. (It just means less admin for me this way.)
  • I think I was wrong about imminent US civil war

    I think I was wrong about imminent US civil war

    I’ve been predicting that the United States would erupt into violence before the end of Trump’s second term. I couldn’t see how that could be avoided. His administration was systematically taking away every means of legal resistance, and normalising violent cruelty as an everyday political tool.

    But now it seems the Republican party is going to get wiped out in the midterm elections, and whilst the deep deep tensions in US political life will carry on after that, I’m not sure the Trump administration will survive.

    They will certainly try to rig the election any way they can. Perhaps they will be successful, in which case my previous prediction still stands.

    But there has been a chain of events that I didn’t predict.

    I didn’t predict the impact of the Epstein files, which probably prompted the Trump administration to invade Iran. I don’t think the administration considered invading Iran was a big deal – after all, invading Venezuela hadn’t been.

    The Iran conflict is now arguably a bigger scandal than the Epstein files, because he has basically ended US military dominance. He has just publicly, and very embarrassingly, lost a war, and possibly crashed the Western economy.

    One of the defining characteristics of the Trump administration and the supporting Republicans up to now has been that they have been bold. They have known that the Democrats don’t have the will to stop them, so they have taken outrageous step after outrageous step, and whilst they haven’t always succeeded they have never been punished in a meaningful way.

    So it seemed pretty obvious that they were going to rig the midterm elections in whatever way they could, and if that didn’t work they would try to cancel them altogether. If they were successful then great, but if not then it’s not as if they were going to get punished for trying.

    However, they have messed up the Iran war so badly, as a way of trying to distract from the Epstein files, which they have also messed up in a catastrophic way. And then there is the fact that Trump’s health is visibly deteriorating.

    I think they’ve just lost the plot.

    If so, what does the future of the United States look like?

    Probably more of a managed decline. The world will probably be thrown into another financial crisis caused by the US, but this time I think it’s likely that nations will focus on forming and strengthening alliances outside of the US global order. Which will reduce American economic might, which will reduce American military might, which will American reduce political influence.

    Domestically, I imagine Trump will be replaced with rogue’s gallery of imitators, who will probably be discarded fairly quickly, until eventually someone else can become build the public support that Trump did.

    In the meantime, there might even be some kind of radical overhaul of the Democrat party. Maybe some kind of Keynesian New Deal, combined with aggressive taxation of billionaires, might stabilise the country.

    If that doesn’t happen (and I personally don’t think it’s likely) then the US will be back where it started – and then there might be civil war.

    But that could be a decade away. A lot can happen in that time.

    When Barrack Obama first stood as a presidential candidate, I confidently predicted that the US would never elect a Black president in a billion years. I was very happy to be proved wrong.

    If the US avoids civil war or revolutionary violence, and particularly if the MAGA movement collapses and it is able to transition to a more progressive political structure, I will be even happier.

  • How YouTube killed the video essay

    How YouTube killed the video essay

    It’s hard to say whether Neil Mohan, the current YouTube CEO, is responsible for the decline of the platform, or if it would’ve happened anyway. But I do feel the platform has declined, and for one very specific reason.

    It’s just too competitive for innovative content to reliably surface to the top anymore.

    Why would that be Mohan’s fault? Did he cause the global pandemic that led everyone (myself included) to start a new YouTube channel?

    Obviously not but, according to many creator,s YouTube has been reducing how much it pays them, despite dramatically increasing its revenue. It’s not enough to make a video that gets seen by a lot of people. You need to make a lot of videos that get seen by a lot of people.

    Anyway, all of this is really just backstory to my big observation.

    Nobody talks in paragraphs on YouTube anymore.

    Once upon a time, everything was a video essay. Everything was carefully scripted. And, increasingly, shot in imaginative ways.

    Now that just takes too long, and creators have to make many more videos to make the money they were making a few years ago.

    So it’s just people in rooms in their house, often in front of green screens, talking to camera. The more established YouTubers may do more sophisticated, carefully-scripted videos but they tend to make more money on their second channel, in which they do a live stream (often on Twitch) which gets cut up into many shorter clip videos.

    Basically, we’ve moved from essays to conversations. Conversations with video podcast co-hosts. Conversations with the live stream chat. Hot takes and off-the-cuff comments.

    And it’s still the case that the creators with the most expertise in their field tend to get the most followers – but the algorithm is pressuring them to constantly talk spontaneously, and have something new to say each day, and there just doesn’t seem to be room for anything other than reacting to the news (which in practice is the actions of a small group of politicians, companies and entertainers).

    So where have the thoughtful essays gone?

    There are still scripted podcasts that can reach a large audience. But I think this kind of considered argument work has moved to website blogs, ironically, and especially email newsletters.

    Part of me is happy with this result, as it’s much easier to create! The barrier to entry is low: you don’t need to be a filmmaker.

    But part of me is already morning extraordinarily vibrant intellectual culture of YouTube maybe seven or eight years ago.

    In my 20s I used to wonder what it would be like to live in an age of great intellectual discussion and discovery. The coffee houses of England in the 1600s. The salons of Paris in the 1700s.

    Then, one day, I realised I was in the middle of an era that dwarfed both of them. It was YouTube. It was vast. It was global. And it was where everybody was.

    Sadly, not anymore.